- HOME
-
Pages
-
Tag cloud
adtention alp d'huzes blogs business children communication community conversation crm crowds crowdsourcing culture customers e-clusion economy Energy evolution filters games google governance government gps health icrowds influence information Internet IPR living labs long tail nabzatag open source Politics privacy recommendation risk science small worlds social networks technology transparancy web 2.0 wiki workspace business models (1)
businessmodel (7)
crowdsourcing (6)
diversity (5)
Energy (3)
everyware (1)
games (1)
governance (6)
IPR (2)
Living Lab (2)
long tail (9)
paticipation (2)
Politics (9)
privacy (10)
recommandation (1)
ReMarketable (1)
research (4)
social networks (11)
Social Software (11)
Tech (3)
Uncategorized (15)
user interface (1)
Workspace (1)
workspace (10)
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Flickr
What am I doing (Twitter)
Archives
September 2010 M T W T F S S « Jun 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Tag cloud books
Legal Smalltalk
Nick Carr
Many2Many
Lawrence Lessig
Borrowitz report
economy
In a post from "The long tail" a small movie director has written an interesting e-mail to Chris Anderson.
But the reality at this time for me and my company is that I need to find multiple large national distributors if I hope to even come close to making a living at this game. And I need to produce fresh content on a reasonably frequent basis. In short, I am a much smaller and more struggling version of the giants that have preceded me.
Your Long Tail theory is a basic and profound truth that I happily embrace AS A CONSUMER. But as a producer and creator of Long Tail content it is basically spelling out my doom. Other than your book examples which are still basically about VERY LARGE entities and aggregators, I am finding very few self supporting examples of independent Long Tail producers.
The general idea of the e-mail is that the long tail with niche content is nice for the consumer but that it is hard for the producer. Fundamentally there are only a few customers in the long tail so ...
black swans
Bill sent me this article that describes how voters have a systematic bias regarding some economic effects. The article questions the fact that voters in general have a bias for anti-market, anti-foreign, anti-efficiency loss of work and a pessimistic outlook. This systematic bias of course would lead to bad decisions since the errors do not even out. The stupidity of the crowds.
Though I think part of the bias is not completely false due the following reasons:
Not all companies are rational too. Look at some of the big mergers in the world where the merger is probably more driven by the ego of the winning CEO than by economical motives. Most large mergers fail
Not all market are markets where demand and supply have a more or less balanced power. Once one side creates a invincible power and becomes a monopoly the market stops. Look at Microsoft or the cartel of energy companies in the Netherlands. Health is also an example where it is very hard to impossible to establish a fair market because it involves your health...
Markets are driven by the ...
