- HOME
-
Pages
-
Tag cloud
adtention alp d'huzes blogs business children communication community conversation crm crowds crowdsourcing culture customers e-clusion economy Energy evolution filters games google governance government gps health icrowds influence information Internet IPR living labs long tail nabzatag open source Politics privacy recommendation risk science small worlds social networks technology transparancy web 2.0 wiki workspace business models (1)
businessmodel (7)
crowdsourcing (6)
diversity (5)
Energy (3)
everyware (1)
games (1)
governance (6)
IPR (2)
Living Lab (2)
long tail (9)
paticipation (2)
Politics (9)
privacy (10)
recommandation (1)
ReMarketable (1)
research (4)
social networks (11)
Social Software (11)
Tech (3)
Uncategorized (15)
user interface (1)
Workspace (1)
workspace (10)
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Flickr
What am I doing (Twitter)
Archives
September 2010 M T W T F S S « Jun 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Tag cloud books
Legal Smalltalk
Nick Carr
Many2Many
Lawrence Lessig
Borrowitz report
science
The Brittanica is doing something very daring: they are starting a discussion about web 2.0 (like what is the relation between Wikipedia and the Brittanica) on a web 2.0 platform (blogs). Sun Tzu whom is no doubt also in the Brittanica, would have taught never to fight on the enemy terrain. Like I said: daring.
The opening piece is from Michael Gorman where he more of less attacks the collective intelligence and defends the traditional way of finding and selecting information. The reactions by the blogging crowds are as you can expect.
However, I think there is one point overlooked by the people reacting (like Clay Shirky) to what Gorman says. Of course is unlimited information flow good. People can express themselves and lots of different opinions are available. However, filtering and rating information is important, in science as well as in everyday news. We have to know how far we can trust the information and the source. In the "old days" our filter were based in the production side. Production was costly through printing and distribution. To make these decisions we employed professionals hired by firms that printed the books and magazines. We as users could ...
Living Labs
The last 10 year we have created much more technology than we are using today. We have invested enormous amounts of money in mobile broadband structures and what is the most important mobile application today: texting (or txtspk), the mobile application that is the most basic in mobile technology. We are investing heavily into fiber to the home and what are people watching: low res video's on Youtube. And they (we?) are loving it.
For many research projects the user was not a part of the equation. Technology had it's own goal: more broadband, more mobile, more functions: more is good. And as all unix users know: more is less...
Today I had a conversation with people from CETIM (Bernhard Katzy, Benoit Dutilleul and Jean-Marc Verlinden) about Living Labs. For technology research it is more and more important to get out into the field.. Because the social aspects and user experience are the next frontier to take we need to do the research in close contact with the users. A new version of ADSL can be developed in the lab, a Wiki can only be created through a constant iteration with users. The number of possible functions are many but only a few will catch ...
